COB Madrid: Jury meeting

arquideas admin
18
Super contributor   1900 puntos
1 Marzo, 2012

On February 21, 2011, arquideas got toguether the Jury of the Coworkin Building (TAP) Madrid academic competition at the Utopic_US exhibition space.

This second phase of deliberation 15 finalists were classified and made it very difficult for the jury and led to intense debate.

The architects Mrs. Martha Thorne, Mrs. Beatriz Matos and Mr. Juan Antonio Gonzalez and the TAP winner team representative, Ms. Cristina Sanchez were well accompanied by other members with voice but no vote. Among them, Rafael de Ramóm, Utopic_US CEO, who made a presentation about coworking, Ms. Natalia Prego, TAP winner team member, Mr. Eduardo de la Peña, Mrs. Belen Hermida and Mr. Jose Luis Gahona, Professors at the CEU school of architecture that took the contest as coursework for their students.

The quality of the proposals generated an intense discussion that gave little opportunity for the Jury to be seated. To the experience as a juror of Martha, Beatriz and Juan Antonio joined Cristina, who brought his academic vision linked to architecture schools and representing the contestants. They also had the more pragmatic point of view of Rafa de Ramon and the constructive comments of the other guest.

The Jury finally and after an intense process of deliberation over two hours, selected the winners from among the finalists. Note that the result was decided by unanimity.

After the Jury meeting a cocktail was held, where the Jury exchanged opinions in a relaxed situation.

The CEU school of architecture will host a temporary exhibition of the finalist projects that can be visited by any interested architect or student.

Comentarios

rosikep738

I am incapable of reading articles online very often, but I’m happy I did today. It is very well written, and your points are well-expressed. I request you warmly, please, don’t ever stop writing. 먹튀검증

saeed25175
love

I ought to impart your records are so relatable. You can visit www.paragraphchecker.com for additional thoughts. We can relate them with our own. Additionally, the best thing about it that we can appreciate how to escape from such negative and hosing things. I genuinely love your works. Keep making for each one out of us.

love

Instructors recognize essential part in making a man a decent understudies. So they should make a relationship of comfort and gratefulness with the understudies Visit this homepage to get writing tips. This will help them in coordinating and seeing one another.

gerif36481

Coming about to researching your article I have come to grasp that why heading is principal until the completion of time. You can click here good tool for wonderful ideas. It gives us learning and makes us tolerable individual of the general people. You additionally have shared enchanting things to see which has made more amped arranged for getting arranging.

gerif36481

Permit the understudies to pick their own particular target. Permit them to pick what they need to do and what they ought to be. I find website for more ideas. Since the obliged choices lead towards the disappointment. So let them pick and play their own distraction with their own good conditions.

gerif36481

Most likely, you are correct we inconceivably require changes in thriving zone. Click here https://www.essaycheckerfree.com/advantages-of-online-essay-revisor/ to read more ideas. I am happy to see that our get together is thinking to make sure about changes thriving part which will be useful for us to improve our success. Your catches about success are inconceivably going to oversee me.

Acacia789h

The jury's meeting had a lot of heated discussions. After a harsh debate over two hours, picked the winners among the finalists
duck life